This Code applies to all undergraduate students, full-time and part-time, in Tulane University. The Mississippi campuses of the School of Professional Advancement will use this Code but will constitute their own Honor Board panels for those campuses.
The integrity of the Newcomb-Tulane College is based on the absolute honesty of the entire community in all academic endeavors. As part of the Tulane University community, undergraduate students have certain responsibilities regarding work that forms the basis for the evaluation of their academic achievement. Students are expected to be familiar with these responsibilities at all times. No member of the university community should tolerate any form of academic dishonesty because the scholarly community of the university depends on the willingness of both instructors and students to uphold the Code of Academic Conduct. When a violation of the Code of Academic Conduct is observed it is the duty of every member of the academic community who has evidence of the violation to take action. Students should take steps to uphold the code by reporting any suspected offense to the instructor or the Associate Dean of Newcomb-Tulane College. Students should under no circumstances tolerate any form of academic dishonesty.
In all work submitted for academic credit, students are expected to represent themselves honestly. The presence of a student's name on any work submitted in completion of an academic assignment is considered to be an assurance that the work and ideas are the result of the student's own intellectual effort, stated in his or her own words, and produced independently, unless clear and explicit acknowledgment of the sources for the work and ideas is included (with the use of quotation marks when quoting someone else's words). This principle applies to papers, tests, homework assignments, artistic productions, laboratory reports, computer programs, and other assignments.
All new students will be informed of this Code. Lack of familiarity with the code or with the precise application of its principles to any specific instance is not an excuse for noncompliance with it.
The terms below are used throughout this document and are defined as follows:
Cheating — Giving, receiving, or using, or attempting to give, receive, or use unauthorized assistance, information, or study aids in academic work, or preventing or attempting to prevent another from using authorized assistance, information, or study aids.
Consulting with any persons other than the course professor and teaching assistants regarding a take-home examination between the time the exam is distributed and the time it is submitted by the student for grading. Students should assume any exam is closed book; they may not consult books, notes, or any other reference material unless explicitly permitted to do so by the instructor of the course.
Unless explicitly allowed by the instructor, electronic devices (such as cell phones, notebooks, calculators, etc.) are not allowed to be out of backpacks or purses during quizzes and exams. These electronic devices must be packed away and turned off. Any student who is caught with one of these devices out will have his/her test taken and will be charged with the Honor Code violation of cheating.
Plagiarism — Unacknowledged or falsely acknowledged presentation of another person's ideas, expressions, or original research as one's own work-in rough or working drafts as well as final drafts. Such an act often gives the reader the impression that the student has written or thought something that he or she has in fact borrowed from another. Any paraphrasing or quotation must be appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism also includes the unacknowledged use of materials prepared by another person or agency engaged in the selling of term papers or other academic materials.
Please consult Acknowledging Sources In Academic Work, a copy of which may be obtained in the Newcomb-Tulane College Dean's Office or the Center for Academic Advising, for more information on documenting sources.
Fabrication — Submission of contrived or altered information in any academic exercise.
False Information — Furnishing false information to any University official, instructor, or Tulane University office relating to any academic assignment or issue.
Unauthorized collaboration — Collaboration not explicitly allowed by the instructor to obtain credit for examinations or course assignments.
Multiple submission — Presentation of a paper or other work for credit in two distinct courses without prior approval by both instructors.
Sabotage — Destroying or damaging another student1s work, or otherwise preventing such work from receiving fair graded assessment.
Unfair advantage — Any behavior disallowed by an instructor that gives an advantage over other fellow students in an academic exercise.
Facilitation of academic dishonesty — Knowingly helping or attempting to help another student violate any provision of the code.
Tampering with academic records — Misrepresenting, tampering with, or attempting to tamper with any portion of a student's academic record.
Improper disclosure — Failure of an honor board member or participant in an honor board hearing to maintain strict confidentiality concerning the identity of students accused of honor code violations.
All instructors shall foster an environment that encourages adherence to the principles of honesty and integrity. Each instructor shall give specific directions concerning the nature of examinations and assignments, stating, for example, when collaboration is permissible.
Each instructor shall be familiar with the principles and procedures of the Code. He or she shall report all suspected violations so that, for example, repeat offenders can be detected. Each instructor shall also appear and testify when called upon by the honor board.
Copy of the Charges
If a violation of the Code is suspected, the Associate Dean will provide the accused student with a copy of the formal charge in writing: the nature and occasion of the alleged violation, the name of the complainant, copies of the documents pertinent to the allegation and a copy of the code within five (5) working days or as soon as practical. The Dean's office sends this packet of material by U.S. Mail to the accused student's local address as listed in Tulane's Student Information System (off campus addresses) and delivers it to the Campus Post Office to be deposited in the accused student's mailbox (on campus addresses).
Associate Dean't Initial Review
If alleged violation of the code has been reported, the Associate Dean shall review written the charge to confirm that the charge being made falls within the scope of this code and that all documents have been prepared according to its provisions. This review shall take place within two (2) working days of the Associate Dean's receipt of the charge.
If, in the considered opinion of the Associate Dean, the charge is improper and should not be taken to a hearing, that decision shall be communicated to the complainant, who retains the right to have the Associate Dean's decision reviewed by the Dean of the Newcomb-Tulane College.
Accused Student’s Review
If the charge is brought to a hearing, the accused student will be allowed five (5) working days to prepare his or her case; an extension to this period will be granted by the Associate Dean if necessary. The accused student is not allowed to withdraw from the course in which he or she has been charged with an Honor Code violation until the case has been resolved.
If the accused student (or students) in the case informs the Associate Dean that she or he plans to plead guilty, the accused student may waive the hearing and the penalty for violating the Code will be a grade of WF for major offenses or a lowering of the grade for minor offenses, as determined by the Dean. No honor board probation will be added to these penalties. The student must also sign a statement acknowledging the violation and the penalty, and in the case of a Code violation involving multiple students, the signed statement will become part of the record in the hearing for any of the other students who do not plead guilty. A student may elect this option only if he or she has no prior convictions and if the violation, in the opinion of the Associate Dean, would not be likely to result in suspension from Tulane if the student were to appear before a hearing panel. Administrative disposition of the case will appear in the student's file as a violation of the Code.
The officer who will chair the hearing shall consult with the complainant and the accused student, if necessary, to ascertain what witnesses should be called in the hearing, to make sure that all concerned understand the workings of the Code.
Right to an Advisor
The accused student has the right to be assisted by an advisor selected from a list of faculty who previously have served on the Honor Board. The Associate Dean will provide the accused student with a list of potential advisors. The advisor may not have an attorney-client relationship with the person advised. The accused student is responsible for presenting his or her own information, and therefore, an advisor is not permitted to speak or to participate directly in any Honor Board hearing. A student who selects an advisor should insure that the advisor's schedule allows attendance at the scheduled date and time of the hearing because delays will not normally be allowed due to the scheduling conflicts of an advisor.
Composition of the Honor Board
The Honor Board is composed of persons selected by the procedure below who may from time to time be asked to serve on an Honor Board panel. The Honor Board shall consist of approximately forty (40) students and twenty-five (25) instructor members from the Schools. It shall be the goal of the Dean of the College to select representation proportional to enrollment from the College and the Schools whenever possible. The size of the pool of members can be increased or decreased at the discretion of the Dean of the College. The Dean of the College shall have the right to remove any member of the Honor Board.
Selecting New Members and Officers of the Honor Board
Composition of Honor Board Hearing Panels
Panels shall be constituted from five (5) members of the Honor Board - three students and two instructors whenever possible. One of the three students must be an officer of the board. If the accused student is in a school, one of the instructor members will be from that school, whenever possible. The panel shall hear cases and determine the guilt or lack of guilt of the accused student(s), and shall recommend appropriate penalties for implementation by the Dean or designate of the Dean.
Honor Board Hearing Panel Procedure
The Honor Board shall determine the rules of procedure for its hearing panels, subject to the approval of the Dean of the Newcomb-Tulane College.
Honor Board Hearing Panel Voting Rights
Students and instructors are voting members of the Honor Board hearing panel and each member has one (1) vote.
Purpose of Hearings
The purpose of the hearing is to provide the student with an opportunity to be heard and to supply the Honor Board hearing panel with the relevant information necessary to reach a decision. It should be noted that a hearing is not a legal procedure and as such, formal rules of process, procedure, and/or technical rules of evidence, such as are applied in criminal or civil court, are not used in Code proceedings. Polygraph tests are not admissible as evidence.
The Honor Board will make every effort to process cases in a timely manner. An officer will convene an Honor Board hearing panel to review the charges brought against the student. Every effort will be made to convene that hearing within fifteen (15) working days after the accused student has been apprised of the charges.
End of the Semester Offenses
If the offense is reported at the end of the semester, the hearing normally will be postponed until the start of the next semester. If the accused student requests a hearing at the end of a semester and an officer and a sufficient number of board members with appropriate representation from the student's school are unavailable to hear a case, the Associate Dean may form an ad hoc panel composed of two instructor members (one from the student's school) and three students. If the case must be heard by an ad hoc panel, it should be heard as soon as possible and no later than fourteen working days after the end of final exams when feasible. If more than one student is accused in the same case and at least one of the accused students desires to postpone the hearing, it shall be deferred until the beginning of the next semester, unless any of the accused students is expected to graduate before the hearing is to take place or will be on a study abroad program in the fall semester.
Failure to Appear
If an accused student, having been notified, does not appear before an Honor Board hearing panel, the information in support of the charges shall be presented and the hearing shall proceed.
If a person is called before an Honor Board hearing panel, the person is obligated to be completely honest. It is every member of the university community's duty to ensure that the principles of the Code are upheld and that the procedures are properly followed.
Procedures for Honor Board Hearing Panel
Sanctions Sanctions for violations of the Code are imposed on the basis of the infraction and any history of repeated violations by the student. In cases of findings of guilt that result in probation, suspension, or expulsion, the offense is noted permanently in the academic record of the student. The appropriate sanctions to be recommended by the Honor Board hearing panel to the Dean of NewcombTulane College for a guilty verdict should include:
Students should be aware that infractions of the Code of Academic Conduct usually warrant a grade of a "WF" for the course and honor board probation of two semesters for a first offense. A conviction for a second offense warrants, and typically results in, suspension or expulsion from the University. In addition, the University reserves the right to withhold institutional support from a student's application for graduate or professional school if violations of the Code are noted in the student's academic record.
The Dean’s Review
The Dean of the Newcomb-Tulane College or the Dean's designate shall review all pertinent materials. If the Dean/designate disagrees with the recommended sanction, he or she must provide the panel with the reasons for disagreement. The Dean/designate, having reviewed all pertinent information, shall notify in writing the student, the instructor, and the chair of the hearing panel of his or her decision within three working days after receipt of the hearing panel's report.
Appellate Board Hearing Procedures
The appellate panel may uphold the hearing panel's decision or set the decision aside and return the case to the Honor Board for a new hearing. This decision shall be communicated in writing to the Dean of the Newcomb-Tulane College and the presiding officer of the Honor Board hearing panel that originally heard the case within one (1) working day. The Dean or designate shall inform the student of the decision within (3) working days of receipt of notification by the chair. If the decision is made to uphold the original decision and sanction, the matter shall be considered final and binding upon all involved.
All printed material distributed during the appellate hearing shall be collected by the chair who shall deposit one copy of the printed materials and tape recording in the files of the Dean. A copy of the report of the appellate panel and the action of the Dean shall be included in the records of the Honor Board.
Attending Classes During the Appellate Processes
Students may continue to attend classes during the appeal process. In the most serious cases, involving expulsion from the University, if the original verdict is upheld under appeal, then no academic credit can be earned for the semester in which the student was notified by the Dean of the expulsion, nor for any further semester into which the appeal process might continue. If the decision to expel the student is upheld, he or she will be eligible for a tuition refund only for the semester(s) during which the appeal was ongoing.
Students exonerated as the result of the appeal process will have the original Honor Code verdict removed from his or her college record and any institutional financial aid that had been withdrawn as a result of the conviction retroactively reinstated.
These regulations may be amended or revised with the approval of the Undergraduate Student Government Association and the faculty of Newcomb-Tulane College.